5 Common Myths About Business Process Automation

By: Ganesan D 11 Jun 2025 Category: Automation

1. Myth: Automation completely replaces cybersecurity professionals

Reality: Automation handles repetitive, time-consuming tasks like log analysis or patch management, but human expertise is essential for threat hunting, interpreting context, and making strategic decisions.

Cybersecurity often requires interpreting complex behaviors and deciding on the best course of action. Automation can flag anomalies, but humans must assess risk, intent, and context.

Automated systems can alert or even quarantine threats, but full incident response — including communication, legal steps, and business continuity — requires human leadership and cross-team collaboration.

2. Myth: Automation leads to more false positives

Reality: When properly configured, automation reduces false positives by filtering out noise and escalating only verified anomalies. It enhances, not hinders, detection accuracy.

Manual analysis can miss patterns or flag harmless events due to fatigue or inconsistency. Automation applies logic consistently, helping reduce subjective errors that cause false positives.

Many automated tools use machine learning models that learn from historical data. As they train over time, they become better at distinguishing real threats from noise, thereby minimizing false alerts.

3. Myth: Only large enterprises can afford automation

Reality: Today, many automation tools are scalable and cloud-based, making them accessible and cost-effective for small and mid-sized businesses (SMBs) too. Open-source solutions also reduce entry barriers.

Many security automation platforms now offer SaaS models with monthly subscriptions, pay-as-you-go pricing, and free tiers — making them accessible for startups and SMBs.

You don’t need to automate everything at once. Businesses can start small — automating tasks like alerting or basic log analysis — and scale gradually as needs and budgets grow.

4. Myth: Automation is “set it and forget it”

Reality: Cyber threats evolve constantly. Automated systems must be updated, tuned, and monitored regularly to stay effective. Human oversight ensures they adapt to new threat landscapes.

Cyberattacks are not static — they adapt quickly. Automation tools must be updated regularly to stay effective against new attack vectors, malware variants, and vulnerabilities.

Over time, business environments change (new software, systems, users). Without regular tuning, automation rules can become outdated or irrelevant, leading to blind spots or false alerts.

5. Myth: Automation makes systems invincible

Reality: No tool can guarantee 100% protection. Automation enhances speed and consistency, but a layered defense strategy with human vigilance is still essential to combat sophisticated attacks.

Attackers constantly invent new tactics. Automation relies on known patterns and behavior — it can’t catch highly novel, zero-day threats without human analysis and adaptation.

Advanced persistent threats (APTs) and targeted attacks often disguise themselves as legitimate activity. Only skilled analysts can spot these subtle intrusions that automation may overlook.